Saturday, October 7, 2017

Complaints are a mark of... faith?

Exodus 16:1-18

            A lot happens between last week’s story of Moses and the burning bush and today’s reading: Plagues descend on Egypt; Moses and Aaron stand before Pharaoh again and again, saying “Let my people go;” eventually, the plagues crescendo into the death of the firstborn and Pharaoh gives in, albeit momentarily; Israel escapes from Egypt, the Red Sea parts and Pharaoh’s army, following after them, are overwhelmed by the crashing waters; and finally the Israelites begin to wander in the wilderness.
            So it is that the complainers start to arise… again and again and again. You have to remember: Moses just saved this people from slavery; it was through Moses that God sent plagues on the land, and it is through God that their own children were spared while the Egyptian children were not. It was by the hand of God, working through Moses, that the people walked through the Red Sea on dry land. If ever there were a people in the history of the world who should be grateful it should be Israel; it would have to be Israel.
            Yet, according to Exodus 16, on the fifteenth day of the second month Israel cried out: "If only we had died by the hand of the Lord in the land of Egypt, when we sat by the fleshpots and ate our fill of bread; for you have brought us out into this wilderness to kill this whole assembly with hunger."
            We all know that hunger does irrational things to people; it makes them angry; and they do have a point in a way. Death is death—whether at the hands of Pharaoh, or free but starving in the desert, death is death. On the one hand it has only been forty-three days since God parted the Red Sea; you would think this would make them a people who would trust completely; you would think that since God got them this far they would trust even further still. On the other hand, maybe they did trust. Maybe they trusted that food would come on the third day and the fifth day; maybe they held out hope until the tenth and the fifteenth and the twentieth. Come to think of it, it’s kind of remarkable it is the middle of the second month—40-odd days since escaping the slavery of Pharaoh—before the people rose up in complaint. They are human after all.
            You see, if you’re thinking the message here is about Israel’s faithlessness, think again. Raising one’s voice in complaint, begging even, is not the opposite of being faithful, or at least if it is God gives no indication that this is the case. God only commends them; suggests, even that this complaining is a mark of faith, and not a blemish.
            Everyone need the basics taken care of first. Missionaries know this; disaster relief workers know it. You don’t go into a place where people are starving, where they don’t have clean water or adequate housing, and tell them about Jesus. We don’t go to Puerto Rico or Mexico and tell people about Jesus. First you feed them and clothe them and do what you can to be Jesus for them, so that when they ask you why it is you are doing these things you can point to Jesus and you hardly have to say a word. Your actions speak for themselves.
The Israelites in the wilderness are not lacking faith; they are dying of hunger. Israel is pushed the edge of oblivion and they decide, “No, we need to live.”
There’s a story in the Gospels that we might read alongside this story. It’s the story of the rich man who comes to Jesus and asks what he must do to have eternal life: Is having faith enough? Well, yes. But when it comes down to it, is your faith ever really tested until you have nothing else? Jesus points out that the man’s faith is dependent on the nice things he has. So he is told to go, give away everything—put yourselves on death’s door—and then see if you have faith. See if you have faith when you’re starving; see if you have faith when your children are starving. Say, “Lord, save me, because to whom else can I go?” That’s the test. But it’s more than that, because Jesus tells the rich man in that story not just to give away so much that it hurts; not even to take himself to death’s door. No, the man is to give it all away. Everything. Even your life. Die, for the sake of your faith.
            Faith is faith unto death, which is a paradox. Israel can’t all just die in the wilderness, which is why we would do well to read this story alongside a third story—one we read not long ago—because this is a continuation of that story: The story of Abraham.
A few weeks back we read about the near-sacrifice of Isaac. God commands Abraham to take his son, Isaac, up on to Mount Moriah and sacrifice him. Remarkably, Abraham obeys… or at least it seems like he was going through with it until, in that last instant, as Abraham raises the knife with his son already bound, God intervenes. It is a terrible, awful thing to consider—killing your child because God says so—and it also seems contrary to God’s will for us. If Abraham succeeds, where would that leave the chosen people? Where would it leave us if Isaac were dead, or if Israel died in the wilderness? Where would God’s faithfulness be in that? We might even be tempted to say that a loving God would never allow that to happen. But that misses something crucial in this story: There are two kinds of faithfulness being tested here—both in the stories of Abraham and Isaac and in the story of Israel wandering in the wilderness. There is the faithfulness of God and the faithfulness of Israel. And the faithfulness of God has already been demonstrated when his chosen people are faithful—that was the story of Abraham and Isaac. God did stop Abraham short. Abraham was absurdly faithful so God was faithful to him. But that’s not the only question. After Abraham we might wonder: What will happen if God’s chosen people say “no”? What happens if they do not accept death? What happens if they complain?
            Where Abraham zigs Israel zags, which makes complete sense if you think about it. Israel is a nation after the heart of Jacob; a nation whose identity is intricately connected with struggling with God, whose name “Israel” means “to wrestle with God.” All of this is connected to the stories we’ve been reading the last several weeks—it’s all connected from Abraham to Israel, who was Jacob, and to Moses and Israel. This is the next vision of what faithfulness looks like. It’s a progression that doesn’t stop here. On the one hand, it might be easier if the only faithfulness was Abraham’s—total, complete obedience and servitude. But on the other hand not all of us seem called to submission. Sure, God commends Abraham, but would Israel have gone through with it as Abraham did? It seems unlikely. So, it appears there is more than one way to be faithful—to wrestle with God or submit. Both are signs of faithfulness.
            What was faithful for one person—for Abraham—was not the same answer for Israel, and God responds in turn. God hears the complaints of the people and sends them quails and manna. God doesn’t chastise them; in fact, it’s almost like God is waiting for Israel to finally speak up. It begs the question: Are their complaints about a lack of faith, or is faith asking for what you might actually need?
            The Bible seems to say “yes and no” to all these questions, which is infuriating and also pretty incredibly honest. As much as we might want to say that to be faithful is to do this one thing in all circumstances, whether that thing is submission or self-defense, whether it’s sitting in trust of God’s plan or following our hearts into action, it seems clear that there is no one answer for all people. Some of us are Abraham; some are Israel. Most of us are both, depending on the day.
            This was brought home to me as I was writing this sermon, actually, in a coffee shop in Grand Forks, when a couple of people sat down behind me. It was two young women talking about submission to God’s will, about how they have been trying to let God do what God will with them; not their will but God’s through them. There’s something commendable in that attitude, but I found myself thinking, as I was eavesdropping on this conversation (which—to be fair—I think the whole coffee shop heard) their experience rings true to me but I have a hard time believing this is for everyone. Sometimes faithfulness is submitting to God’s will and sometimes it isn’t; sometimes it’s wrestling with God, too. Sometimes it’s being honest about your complaints. You can’t wrestle with something that you don’t believe to be real. It’s just as much an act of faith to struggle as it is to submit; it’s just different. Where some people need to submit, others need to fight. And I think, honestly, truly, that’s OK.
            If the story of the chosen people is any indication God works through both kinds, and I find that to be a tremendous comfort, because we are not one size fits all. We are not all Abraham. We are not all Jacob turned Israel. God calls some to submit and some to resist, some to speak and some to listen, some to wait and some to act. We need to personally strive for what God is calling us to be particularly in all of our uniqueness; in all of our good and our bad. At the end of the day, whether we wrestle and complain, or submit and follow, God meets us, provides, and saves us. In the end, that’s all that matters.

No comments:

Post a Comment