Well, today is my chance to go fire
and brimstone on you… but I’m not going to do it. There’s a problem with trying
to make the story of Lazarus and the rich man into a fire and brimstone Gospel:
there’s nothing about repentance in this story—nothing. It doesn’t say repent
or burn, as we can imagine any number of preachers and prophets saying.
Furthermore, the fire and brimstone message seems inconsistent with the Gospel of Luke. In this very same
Gospel, Jesus has said A) you are rich and you can never give enough away, and
B) rich people are tormented for eternity in hell. Doesn’t it suddenly seem
like a long time since we were singing “What a fellowship, what a joy divine?”
This
is why people don’t like talking in church. You’re not disinterested (after
all, you are here), but you haven’t got it figured out. And you know what?
That’s OK. So, returning to the CRU rep, this guy went on to tell me that the
Bible is clear that there is a hell for those sinners who do not
repent—probably, I assumed, those people who did not join CRU and lift their hands
up to the sky during worship songs or something like that. And I partly
believed him. After all, we confess that there is a hell in the Apostles’
Creed; that’s where Jesus went after dying before even rising from the dead. But, in another sense, the interest
in hellfire troubled me. It troubled me for the same reason today’s Gospel
troubles me, because taken on its own it makes perfect sense. Don’t be a rich
snob, love the poor, and God will love you in return. That is a simple,
straightforward message. The problem isn’t that it’s difficult to
follow-through—if that were so then the Christian faith would merely be about rigorous
discipline—but it’s not difficult to do; it’s actually impossible.
You’ve
heard me say this before: you can’t give away everything. If we gave everything
away we would die, which seems to be exactly what Jesus wants from us. Deny
yourself, pick up your cross and follow, he says. But if in some perfect world
all of us did exactly this to the point of giving up our own lives, we would
actually then be in direct conflict with another of God’s laws, which is to be
fruitful and multiply. If you follow the clear and obvious meaning of scripture
to its last detail you must be fruitful, multiply and fill the earth, while
simultaneously picking up your cross and following Jesus to your death. That’s
the path to heaven. Good luck.
So,
what are we left with? What more do we have if this clear meaning of scripture
is a riddle that appears unsolvable? The more I think about it; the more I
think it all hinges on the last line when Abraham tells the rich man, suffering
in hell, “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be
convinced even if someone rises from the dead.'”
Well,
what if somebody did rise from the dead? What if this story isn’t just a parable
about rich people and poor people? What if it is actually foreshadowing the future? If listening to Moses and the prophets does not work, then even Jesus
Christ, risen from the dead, will not convince anybody. I believe that is
precisely the world in which we live. We are not convinced by Moses, nor the
prophets (I know because every time we read from the laws of the Old Testament
your eyes close a little bit more… and a little bit more), but neither are we
convinced even by the risen Jesus. If we were we would give everything, but we
don’t and so none of us do enough to justify getting into heaven. None of us
match up to the Campus Crusade checklist. I once heard from a friend who had a
conversation with a CRU rep (it might have been the same guy, I don’t know),
who asked him, “How many people do you think are saved at Augustana?” You’ve
all heard some version of this question, even if it’s the most patently stupid
question a faithful Christian can ask. “I don’t know,” my friend said, “What do
you think?”
The CRU rep said,
straight-faced, “Maybe 10 or 12.” 10 or 12 out of 1700 students, not to mention
faculty or staff. But to the CRU leader this is the kind of divine arithmetic
that makes sense, because to them a relationship with Jesus is
a lot of work on our behalf. It is discipline and restraint and all those virtues your grandparents taught you, because the
hardest reward demands the hardest work. The problem with that philosophy
is that we are fooling ourselves if we think that even 10 or 12 out of 1700
would be good enough by those criteria. It’s not 10 or 12. It’s zero. We don’t
match up. I don’t know those CRU reps personally—I’m sure they are devoted
Christians and wonderful people—but I know for certain that they do not match
up to Jesus’ criteria.
The
only hope any of us have is that when Jesus died the rules of the game changed.
When we confess our faith in the Apostles’ Creed we proclaim that Jesus died
and descended into hell before ever rising from the dead. Maybe you’ve never
stopped to think about that, except possibly to become a little uneasy that
we’re talking about hell in church, but it’s a fantastic thing. Jesus Christ, the
Savior of the world, went to hell for us. That means that you can go absolutely
nowhere in the world or in the heavens or even into the depths of hell that God
has not been. Even hell. And that is a powerfully important thing, because the
truth is that we can have no certainty where we are heading without Christ.
Even if we follow the law and the prophets, even if we say we believe in Jesus
Christ, a part of us will hold firm—the part of us that resonates with the rich
man, who may very well have given food to Lazarus in his lifetime (after all, why was Lazarus always there if he received nothing in return?), but just not
enough; never enough. That’s where we stand before the resurrection, on the
precipice of never doing enough.
The
plight of the rich man is our plight. Don’t think you’re any better than that.
But, on the other hand, we have a Savior who gave himself up so that in spite
of that we do not face the same destination, so that—when we meet Abraham on
the other side of the veil—we do not have to justify our goodness but have only
to point to the one who was goodness on our behalf.
Thanks
be to God for that.
No comments:
Post a Comment