One language.
One people. One focus. The Tower of Babel starts out sounding like a kind of utopia:
everybody working together for a common goal. It seems like an image of the
Kingdom of God.
We like the idea of unity. We like coming together to get things done. The idea that we can
create something great as a single unified people impacts our politics, our
social movements and certainly our churches. Take the Olympics. A couple weeks
from now the Summer Olympics will be starting up in London with some 190
countries and thousands of athletes. The event, as always, will be described as
a great unifier. We come from one world with one distinct goal in mind. For
the Olympics it's to win a medal or simply to represent your country. For
political and social movements it may be some concept of world peace. For everyone, it is something bigger than ourselves that achieves greater meaning
because of unity of purpose.
There's nothing
wrong with world peace or for that matter the idea that we should be a united
people, but there is something wrong with the Babel picture. We might not be
able to quite put our fingers on it at first because the Babel builders share
some of our misconceptions. Our idea of unity is so often not about lifting up
the lowly, bringing justice for the oppressed, hope for the hopeless, or peace
to the war-torn. Our idealism of unity does not match our expressions of it. We
have a Babel problem. We want to climb a tower to heaven to demonstrate our
righteousness. We want, in short, to be God.
This might seem
like quite a leap, so allow me to illustrate with an example
courtesy of our youth. Fifteen of our young people just returned
yesterday from a mission trip to Cortez, Colorado where we spent a week working
in one of the poorest areas of the United States. Over the course of our time
there we encountered heartbreaking situations: kids whose only meal is from the
church once a day, homes that looked more like dilapidated trailers, and people
impacted by violence, absent families and inadequate education. This was, in every
way, a long way from the experiences we have on a daily basis here in the
northwest corner of Minnesota.
I found myself wondering what unity looks like in light of that
trip and the Tower of Babel.
What does it mean to be united with people whose life experiences are so
drastically different from our own? What does unity look like between the youth
of Kittson County and the kids we met in Cortez?
With hugely
apparent social and cultural divides, let me start with what unity does
not look like. True unity is not the Tower of Babel. You see, the Tower of
Babel starts out looking like a story about uniting together for a common
purpose; the exact kind of story that speaks to our inner idealism, but unity
without a deeper purpose is finally just shallow. Babel unity looks like trying to become like God--perhaps the shallowest of any endeavor. It is unity in name only, not in purpose.
Babel demonstrates that there is a difference between unity and group-think. To say that we
are united does not mean that we think the same way, act the same way, speak
the same languages, or have the same or similar life experiences. If so, then
our youth and the kids of Cortez would have no hope for unity; a chasm
separates our life experience and theirs. But if unity is more than
group-think, if it's more than believing the same things or speaking the same
language--in short, if unity not only tolerates disagreement but embraces
it--then we can be united with people who bear no resemblance to us.
What I saw this past week taught me that this kind of unity is not
only possible, in fact it is necessary to embrace one another across those
things that divide us. Our youth walked in to a situation they could not have
been prepared for and they did the most remarkable of things: they treated kids
who looked and sounded nothing like them as if they were the most important
people in their lives. They showed love without regard for their own well-being
or for what they would get out of it. Our youth had no Babel problem--they had
no God complex. Maybe this is why Jesus was adamant that to enter the kingdom of heaven we would have to become like
children. We have to give up our desires
for the sake of someone else, and that is something that children excel at far
better than the rest of us.
One example: One day at snack
time before the kids returned home one of our youth had a young girl on his lap
as she was eating her sandwich. The girl was five years old, though she looked
more like three and seemed half-likely to be blown away by the first swift
breeze. It was obvious enough that she was going without food on a regular basis. So it was important
for her, more than anyone else, to have that snack--a peanut butter and jelly
sandwich--before heading home. But something remarkable happened during that
snack time, something that just doesn't square with our innate sense of
self-preservation. That girl, closer to starvation than is fathomable in the
developed world, turned to our young man and said, "I'm really hungry but
you can have some if you want."
That is the
kingdom of God. That is what Jesus would have us see in one another. It looks
nothing like Babel, because it is selfless, its intentions are pure. True power
is not found in reaching for God. It is not achieved by building a towering
city to heaven. It is not becoming more like God. It is not even about doing
what is right. True power is giving up your desires for the sake of somebody
else, even when your desires are for something as basic as food that would
otherwise leave you starving.
Thanks for sharing this, Frank. Glad you had a safe trip. The generosity of the poor never ceases to amaze me.
ReplyDelete