Sunday, October 14, 2018

Why the Old Testament is so stinking repetitive (and baptism is not)

Joshua 24

What do you know about the Old Testament? If you’re like many Christians, the answer is not much. You probably know a few stories—there’s the creation of the world; there’s an ark; Moses, plagues and parting the Red Sea; there’s Jonah; and maybe, if you really stretch your memory back to Sunday School, you might remember a few other things. Perhaps you know quite a bit more than that, or maybe even those few events were testing the limits of your memory. Wherever you find yourself when it comes to the Old Testament, there is some good news: The Old Testament is really good at repeating itself.
            Many of our readings, including today’s from the book of Joshua, spend a large amount of time retelling a series of historical events. Often, God is the one sharing that history. God says, “Long ago your ancestors—Terah and his sons Abraham and Nahor—lived beyond the Euphrates and served other gods. Then I took your father Abraham from beyond the River and led him through all the land of Canaan and made his offspring many. I gave him Isaac…” etc, etc, etc. Pretty soon, God is listing off the entire history of Genesis and Exodus. Then, God just keeps on going, telling us about kings and nations and history, lots of history. You might wonder: Why? Today’s reading could have been 90% shorter if God just skipped to the point. Many of you probably would have liked that.
            In order to understand why the Old Testament is so repetitive, you need to imagine the way these stories were passed down. People didn’t write them down. Few people were literate—why would they be? Even if you had the materials to write a book; you can imagine the effort—writing each individual copy! It would be centuries before there were scrolls, and even then most people—even devout Jews—would never see them, and only the priests could read them. This was an agrarian society; people didn’t need to know how to read, but they certainly did know how to tell stories. For centuries, these stories about God were passed on around campfires and dinner tables. People told them over and over, each story like a thread weaving the tapestry of the history of the nation, each character stacking their rock on the cairn that is the history of the Hebrew people. God became known through these historical characters. God’s name became “I am the Lord, your God, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.”
            Nobody was going to know about the stories unless they were repeated again and again. You couldn’t go to Amazon and order a copy of the Hebrew Bible. Beyond that, the world of Old Testament gods was awfully competitive. Everybody had a god to worship. One of the common misconceptions we have about the Hebrew people in the Old Testament is that they believed there was only one God, which is not quite right. They actually believed there were many gods; it’s just that their God was the only one worth anything (if you want a useless vocab word for the day; this is called “henotheism”—Israel was henotheistic). So, these stories told around campfires that became the Old Testament were concerned with telling us that the true God was powerful and other gods were not. Whose God opened Sarah’s womb in her old age? Who led the people Israel out of slavery through plagues and wonders? Who flooded the world? This God is powerful. This God is worthy of being remembered.
            As Christians, we take this Old Testament with all its history and cherish it as our heritage—this God of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob is our God—but it can be hard to know what we are supposed to learn from it. Moreover, when Jesus came into the picture something changed dramatically. When Jesus rises on Easter morning, we became Easter people. Easter people no longer need to say, “I believe in the Lord, who brought his people out of Egypt, who went before them as a pillar of cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night…” and it’s not because we don’t care about that. It’s just that, as Christians, the proclamation of our salvation rests in a single moment, the singular act of the resurrection. As Christians, we only have to point to Easter To say, “I believe in the God who rises from the dead” is more than enough. Salvation comes from the cross through the empty tomb. In much the same way, this is why we baptize as we do. One baptism. One moment. Once and for all forgiveness, because that’s what Jesus gave us on the cross, and that’s where it was made known to us in the empty tomb.
            I think about this story of Joshua. Joshua weighs all the stories of the past, telling us that God has done all these amazing things, and then, at the end, he tells us “As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.” That’s such a natural way to talk about faith development. You list off all the things God has done—things we’ve read about in the Bible—and then we proclaim, “As for me, I will serve the Lord.” I suspect that many of you can resonate with this kind of faith declaration. You weighed the evidence and decided, at the end of the day, to serve God.
            That’s not wrong, but, after Christ, our declaration of faith happens second. First comes the resurrection promise. You are saved by grace through faith because of what Jesus did on the cross. This is why we baptize infants, because you can’t choose it; it’s yours already. Then, only then, do you get to turn around and say, “Yes, I will serve the Lord,” not as the thing that saves you, but as the thing you feel compelled to do because of what God has done for you.
            So, today, I get to baptize Elias not because he has declared this to be true. He gets zero say in the matter. I want him to have a load of freedom in his life. I want him to have the freedom to become the person he would like to be, I want him to have the freedom to fail, and to pick himself up. I want him to choose a bunch of things, but not this—not baptism. And I say this not because I think baptism is magic, or that it will guilt him into staying in the church, or anything like that. Rather, I want him to know that God has chosen him and loves him no matter the path he walks, no matter how he treats God, or even if turns his back on everything we value as a family. No matter what comes next, we want him to know that God has chosen him first.
            So, this Christian faith is subtly different from the faith of Joshua. Joshua didn’t have the resurrection; his belief was rooted in a history of God’s salvation of Israel, but since we have the resurrection—since we have Jesus—we get to throw around grace with reckless abandon, knowing that we don’t deserve this baptism, this faith is always a gift, and, in the end, we are saved, like Elias—like all children of God—not by what we do but by what Jesus has done for us.
Amen.

No comments:

Post a Comment